oleksandrdubyna88/dew_flow_connect_other_ais

ConnectOtherAIs

Your coding agent cannot see its own assumptions. This puts the plan and the diff in front of other vendors' models — before either reaches you.

The value is not more review. It is review by a model that cannot see the author's reasoning — the only kind that catches the author's assumptions.

Every round, every finding, which vendor raised it, whether it was accepted or rejected and why — and what it cost. That table is the product.

The problem

You already review your agent's work with your agent. It reads the diff it just wrote, with the reasoning that produced it still in the context, and agrees with itself.

| Reviewing with one vendor | With ConnectOtherAIs | |---|---| | The model that wrote it also judges it | Other vendors read it with no memory of the reasoning that produced it | | Formatting nits arrive as findings | Only Blocking and Major count toward the gate — one line of code | | Three bots raise one defect three times | Same file, lines within ±5, same remark → one finding (LineSlack = 5) | | The who